Abstract:The fault-controlled reservoirs are important targets of exploration and development. Structural imaging distortion is commonly present in seismic shadow areas caused by faults, and the conventional offshore narrow azimuth three-dimensional (3D) seismic data is difficult to satisfy the structural research under this background. According to two-azimuth seismic streamer acquisition data in different years of typical fault-controlled reservoirs in the South China Sea, this paper analyzed the difference of 3D seismic data in different azimuths by velocity investigation. Based on the fused seismic gather data processed by prestack consistency and five-dimensional (5D) regularization, fault-controlled constrained grid tomography velocity modeling and tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) medium depth migration in the offset vector tile (OVT) domain were adopted, and high precision anisotropic velocity model was obtained. The actual seismic data processing results show that the data quality of the two-azimuth fusion in the depth domain is significantly improved, and the fault surface imaging accuracy is high. The seismic reflection energy is focused in the fault shadow areas, and the events are continuous. The structural distortion is basically eliminated, and the depth error with newly drilled well is greatly reduced. It provides a reliable basis for structural research and efficient oilfield development and offers a new idea for exploration of the same type of fault-controlled reservoirs in the region.
TRINCHERO E. The fault shadow problem as an interpretation pitfall[J]. The Leading Edge, 2000, 19(2):132-135.
[2]
CHEN Haiqing, DAI Xiaoyun, PAN Liangyun, et al. False structures on time domain seismic sections and corresponding resolutions[J]. Oil Geophysical Pros-pecting, 2009, 44(5):590-596.陈海清, 戴晓云, 潘良云, 等. 时间剖面上的假构造及其解决方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2009, 44(5):590-596.
[3]
PENG Hailong, DENG Yong, HE Jianwei, et al. Resolving fault shadow problems by pre-stack depth migration based on 3D velocity model building with fault and horizon constrained interpretation[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32(6):2520-2526.彭海龙, 邓勇, 赫建伟, 等. 基于断层与层位约束的3D速度建模方法在消除断层阴影中的应用研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(6):2520-2526.
[4]
ZHANG Zaijin, CHEN Keyang, FAN Xingcai, et al. Seismic wave velocity modelling through grid tomography inversion constrained by well logging and structural modeling[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020, 59(2):208-217.张在金, 陈可洋, 范兴才, 等. 井控与构造约束条件下的网格层析速度建模技术及应用[J]. 石油物探, 2020, 59(2):208-217.
[5]
LI Li, SHEN Shuirong, WU Yiming, et al. Velocity modeling combining full waveform inversion with fault controlled tomographic inversion:A case study of A oilfield in the eastern South China Sea[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2020, 32(5):107-113.李黎, 沈水荣, 吴意明, 等. 全波形反演与断控层析反演联合速度建模——以南海东部A油田为例[J]. 中国海上油气, 2020, 32(5):107-113.
[6]
DUAN Wensheng, LI Fei, HUANG Luzhong, et al. Wide azimuth tomographic velocity model building and depth imaging in the OVT domain[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2016, 51(3):521-528.段文胜, 李飞, 黄录忠, 等. OVT域宽方位层析速度建模与深度域成像[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2016, 51(3):521-528.
[7]
LI Ang, ZHANG Liyan, YANG Jianguo, et al. Analysis and processing technology of azimuth anisotropy in OVT domain of wide-azimuth seismic data[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2021, 56(1):62-68.李昂, 张丽艳, 杨建国, 等. 宽方位地震OVT域方位各向异性校正技术[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2021, 56(1):62-68.
[8]
ZHANG Liyan, LI Ang, YANG Jianguo, et al. Full-azimuth gather velocity modeling method and application[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2022, 65(10):4063-4072.张丽艳, 李昂, 杨建国, 等. 全方位道集速度建模方法及应用[J]. 地球物理学报, 2022, 65(10):4063-4072.
[9]
LI Xuxuan, WEN Shuliang, YIN Cheng. A research on energy distribution pattern of seismic illumination along various acquisition direction on deep rough seafloor[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2010, 22(2):73-76, 82.李绪宣, 温书亮, 尹成. 深水崎岖海底区不同采集方向地震波照明能量分布特征研究[J]. 中国海上油气, 2010, 22(2):73-76, 82.
[10]
ZHANG Zhenbo, LUO Wei. Analysis of the effects of wide-azimuth and double-azimuth for marine streamer[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2021, 37(3):66-73.张振波, 罗伟. 拖缆宽方位与双方位效果分析[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2021, 37(3):66-73.
[11]
ZHU Ming, HE Min, ZHANG Zhenbo, et al. Combined imaging of offshore second two-azimuth 3D seismic data[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2016, 28(6):15-20.朱明, 何敏, 张振波, 等. 海上二次三维双方位地震资料联合成像[J]. 中国海上油气, 2016, 28(6):15-20.
[12]
DENG Dun, DENG Yong, MA Guangke, et al. Two-azimuth deep water seismic data combined imaging in rugged seabed areas[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2019, 54(6):1293-1301.邓盾, 邓勇, 马光克, 等. 双方位地震资料联合成像处理技术在深水崎岖海底区的应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2019, 54(6):1293-1301.
[13]
XIAO Zhangbo, ZHANG Sufang, LEI Yongchang, et al. Application of a joint imaging technique entailing dual-azimuth seismicdata acquired by deeper-towing flat-streamers on complex structures of the Paleogene[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2021, 60(6):971-982.肖张波, 张素芳, 雷永昌, 等. 深拖平缆双方位地震资料联合成像技术在古近系复杂构造区的应用[J]. 石油物探, 2021, 60(6):971-982.
[14]
BAI Haijun, YUAN Yang, YANG Dengfeng, et al. Application of offshore 3D dual-azimuth seismic data processing to the Panyu 4 Sag[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2022, 38(3):82-88.白海军, 袁阳, 杨登锋, 等. 海上三维双方位融合处理技术在番禺4洼的应用[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2022, 38(3):82-88.
[15]
TSVANKIN I, GRECHKA V. Seismology of azimuthally anisotropic media and seismic fracture characterization[M].SEG, Tulsa, 2011.
[16]
ZHOU Fan, ZHOU Yunhe, JIANG Fan, et al. Research on ghost suppression technology when ghost delay changes with offset[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2021, 37(11):70-77.周凡, 周云和, 江凡, 等. 鬼波延迟随偏移距变化时鬼波压制技术[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2021, 37(11):70-77.
[17]
QING Jie, GU Hanming, WANG Jianhua. A ghost wave suppression method based on frequency-slowness domain extension by optimization of key parameters[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2023, 58(1):121-132.青杰, 顾汉明, 王建花. 频率-慢度域延拓关键参数优化的鬼波压制方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2023, 58(1):121-132.
[18]
CHEN Shenghong,ZHONG Guangjian,WU Lushan, et al. Integrated broadband and high-precision quasi-3D processing technology for geological targets in the Mesozoic of the northern South China Sea[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2022, 57(5):1076-1087.陈胜红, 钟广见, 吴庐山, 等. 面向南海北部中生界地质目标的宽频高精度准三维处理集成技术[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2022, 57(5):1076-1087.
[19]
CHENG Chaohui, YUAN Yijun, LIU Sheng, et al. Application of wideband wavelet deconvolution for tight oil exploration[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2023, 62(1):119-129.程朝辉, 苑益军, 刘晟, 等. 宽带子波反褶积方法在致密储层地震资料处理中的应用[J]. 石油物探, 2023, 62(1):119-129.
[20]
LIU Xiaoliang, LI Fei, YU Bo. Application and effect of five dimensional interpolation technology in OVT domain migration[C]. Proceedings of the 2022 China Petroleum Geophysical Exploration Academic Annual Conference (Volume 1), Haikou, Hainan, China, 2022, 715-718.刘小亮, 李斐, 于波. 五维插值技术在OVT域偏移中的应用及效果[C]. 2022年中国石油物探学术年会论文集(上册), 中国海南海口, 2022, 715-718.
[21]
YANG Qinyong, GUO Kai, LI Bo, et al. Application of TTI anisotropic seismic imaging in shale gas exploration[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2019, 58(6):882-889.杨勤勇, 郭恺, 李博, 等. 各向异性地震成像技术及其在页岩气勘探中的应用[J]. 石油物探, 2019, 58(6):882-889.